Connect with sales

*

Contact information

* This field is mandatory

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

By specifying your reason for contact we will be able to provide you with a better service.

We work with partners and distributors who may contact you about this Philips product on our behalf.

*
*

Final CEE consent

Stay up-to-date and subscribe.

Join your peers, sign-up to stay informed and receive insights into healthcare innovations, straight to your inbox.

(Please be sure to check the box to receive communications from Philips)

Contact information

* This field is mandatory

*

Contact details

*
*
*

Company details

*
*
*

ED throughput: Reducing walk-out rate by 85.3% at St. Mary Medical Center

St. Mary's

Improving ED workflow and performance at a 44-treatment emergency department

When an emergency department’s workflow is inefficient, wait times can increase, care is not always provided in a timely manner and patient and staff satisfaction may suffer. This was the situation at St. Mary Medical Center (SMMC) in Apple Valley, California, in early 2015.

 

The 44-treatment emergency department was receiving approximately 82,800 visits annually and was struggling with a constrained physical plant space, recurring gaps in ED nursing leadership, prolonged ED lengths of stay and high left without being seen rates.*

Results

When St. Mary Medical Center began its engagement with Philips, ESI level-3 patients often found themselves in the ED waiting room, not knowing what the plan was for their care, with no ownership from staff, for a stay that could seem like an eternity. This project helped develop and implement a process that resulted in:

info line trending upward

growth in average daily census

LWBS infographic

reduction in LWBS

LWBS infographic

reduction in arrival-to-provider time

34.3% reduction

reduction in discharge patient LOS*

Our assessment methodology

 
  • Review of data collected for patient volume, arrival patterns, staffing patterns, ESI level distribution, ED billing visit level distribution, disposition breakdown and length of stay

  • Interviews with administrators, departmental leaders, and staff, addressing topics such as intake, triage, processes and education

  • Observation of patient flow, departmental processes and communication

Our recommendations

green check mark

Revise front-end processes to include the intake and triage processes

green check mark

Re-educate staff on the ESI 5-level triage system, to include inter-rater reliability and competency validation

green check mark

Restructure leadership and clarify roles of each member of the ED team, increasing accountability for standards of practice and quality of patient care 

green check mark

Examine utilization of existing space to optimize workflow 

green check mark

Implement standard work processes to address the frequent capacity issues in the ED 

green check mark

Create and agree to a shared vision and mission for the ED leadership team 

AMITA thumbnail

Customer story

How AMITA Health shifted its culture to deliver value-based care

Is your ED not performing to its optimal capability?
Our team can help.

Subscribe today to receive compelling and relevant articles, customer stories and insight into thought leadership perspectives.

You're reading Leadership Perspectives

blue line break

Breaking down hospital walls

blue line break

Discover more perspectives

*Results are specific to the institution where they were obtained and may not reflect the results achievable at other institutions.

You are about to visit a Philips global content page

Continue

You are about to visit a Philips global content page

Continue

Our site can best be viewed with the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Firefox.