How is telehealth changing the face of critical care delivery? 

  • By Philips
  • March 01 2025
  • 7 min read

What is teleICU? In its simplest form, a teleICU enables off-site clinicians to interact with bedside staff to consult on patient care. One centralized care team can manage a large number of geographically dispersed ICU locations to exchange health information electronically, in real time. A teleICU, like Philips eICU, is a supplement – not a replacement – to the bedside team, offering support to increasingly scarce clinical resources.

At-a-glance:

  • TeleICU programs connect bedside intensivists with clinicians in centralized monitoring facilities.
  • TeleICUs can consolidate and standardize care, reduce transfers while maximizing bed utilization and support onsite staff.
  • Philips eICU telehealth program combines A/V technology, predictive analytics, data visualization and advanced reporting capabilities to enable proactive care delivery.
Bedside nurse looking at remote nurse

How TeleICU works

TeleICU programs concentrate clinical resources in central monitoring centers and extend those resources to the bedside via technology, independent of the care center or hospital’s location. Using A/V conferencing and a real-time data stream of patient information from multiple interfaces, a physician or nurse working from a care center in Hamburg, for example, can rapidly care for a patient in Munich, day or night. This connectivity enables an already engaged intensivist or nurse to promptly intervene and consistently provide care aligned with best practices. It also decreases the burden on bedside staff and enables the central monitoring center to provide timely remote training.

Calculating the value

Users are finding that teleICU not only serves a critical role in the effective regional management of ICUs, but positively impacts the healthcare system as a whole. Having a centralized remote patient monitoring center provides the ability to consolidate and standardize care, reduce transfers while maximizing bed utilization and support onsite staff. This reduces costs while enhancing revenues, patient flow and capacity management across the system.

We witness such great things in the Virtual Command Center every single day with continuing collaboration, great catches and improved patient care.

Dr. Gina Ellerbee, DNP, APRN, AACNS-AG, CCRN-K
Administrative Director of Nursing Practice
CoxHealth, Springfield, Missouri, USA

The right technology at the right time

Intensive care units are a critical component of healthcare in the United States. They treat roughly 6 million of the sickest and oldest patients each year.1 Demand for critical care will grow as the population ages and the incidence of chronic disease increases, leading to ICU capacity constraints.

Because of the limited number of intensivists and the cost to attract and retain them, many hospitals find it difficult – or impossible – to staff their ICUs with intensivists 24-7. In fact, The Leapfrog Group found that only 47% of hospitals surveyed have the recommended intensivist coverage.2

There is also a considerable shortage of intensive care nurses, resulting in nurse burnout and staff shortages that increase the caregiver to patient ratio. With an estimated nursing shortage of 400,000 RNs in the US by 2027,3 and 13 million nurses globally by 2030,4 virtual care is an important adjunct to bedside nursing.

Today’s reality is sobering. In the United States:

  • It costs just over $2 million per ICU bed5 yet ICU care will most likely double by 20306
  • Intensivist-staffed ICUs can decrease mortality by 40%2 yet only 10-15% of hospitals employ full-time intensivists7
  • ICU care costs more than $80 billion per year8 yet results in 540,000 deaths per year9
  • Critical care physicians are more likely to experience burnout than their colleagues and are least happy outside of work10
  • 81% of healthcare leaders say delays in care are an issue at their organization because of staff shortages11
  • 92% of healthcare leaders report deteriorating staff well-being, mental health and work-life balance as a result of workforce shortages11
  • 82% of healthcare leaders see the positive impact of virtual care in easing staff shortages11

A solution

By leveraging teleICU capabilities, hospitals can make optimal use of their existing critical care resources, instead of adding additional resources.

In fact, the whole concept of the teleICU was born of the need to maximize resources and to prepare for the increase in ICU usage. Numerous studies demonstrate both the clinical and financial benefits of teleICU, and the continuous stream of patient data captured by teleICU programs can enable health systems to take a more evidence-based approach to population health.

TeleICU can also increase staff satisfaction by enabling nurses an opportunity to continue using their skills and mentoring newer staff without the physical demands of bedside nursing.

Are teleICUs really cost effective?

A study in the journal CHEST took one of the broadest looks yet at the efficacy of the teleICU model, examining more than 51,000 patients across seven adult ICUs.12 While teleICUs have previously been associated with improving mortality rates and length of stay, this study is the first to address the financial outcomes in depth.

The results show:

  • An ICU managed by a teleICU improved case volume by 21% over traditional models
  • A centralized teleICU model improved contribution margins through increased case volume, shorter lengths of stay, and high case revenue relative to direct costs.
  • A teleICU, when co-located with a logistical center (to improve bed utilization), improved case volume 38% over traditional models
  • This care delivery model allowed recovery of the initial capital costs of the ICU telemedicine program in less than 3 months

The ability of teleICU programs to increase case volume and access to high-quality critical care while improving margins suggests a strong financial argument for wider adoption of ICU telemedicine.

Craig M. Lilly, MD.
UMass Memorial Health, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA

Small facilities can benefit from a teleICU with eICU Outreach 

Arriving at the decision that a teleICU will add value and potentially reduce cost is easier than ever, yet the path to implementation can be challenging. In the past, teleICU solutions required significant upfront investment. But today, the model is attainable for all hospitals, regardless of size, operational and technical capacity and intensivist staffing resources. 

We offer the Philips eICU Outreach Program to connect smaller organizations with tele-health services managed by eICU programs at larger facilities. We help set up partnerships among facilities using a Philips eICU program, so a smaller organization can have its critical care beds monitored and realize the benefits of an eICU program with minimal investment. 

Through strategic partnerships, executive and clinical leaders can mobilize or complement their current capabilities to implement a teleICU and realize a financially sustainable option that can improve ICU outcomes. 

Philips and teleICU

An industry leader in telehealth, Philips provides an eICU tele-health program that combines A/V technology, predictive analytics, data visualization and advanced reporting capabilities, enabling proactive care delivery. Philips has more than 20 years of proven success in the field and offers comprehensive guidance from experienced professionals to help assure positive results.

White paper: Calculating the value of a teleICU investment

Copy this URLto share this story with your professional network
Footnotes
  1. Sadaka F, Palagiri A, Trottier S, et al. Telemedicine Intervention Improves ICU Outcomes. Critical Care Research and Practice. 2013; 2013:456389. 
  2. 2015 ICU Physician Staffing Survey conducted by Leapfrog Group. 
  3. Clark, et al. “The US Nursing Shortage: The Gap Could Reach 400K Hospital RN FTEs in 2027.” L.E.K. Insights. (2023):25-82. 
  4. International Council of Nurses (ICN). ICN Policy Brief- the Global Nursing Shortage and Nurse Retention. (2021) 
  5. The Business Case for CUSP. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville, MD. January 2012. Accessed 2017. 
  6. The New England Healthcare Institute (NEHI), Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, Health Technology Center. Critical Care, Critical Choices: The Case for TeleICUs in Intensive Care. Cambridge, MA: NEHI; 2010. 
  7. Pronovost, PJ, et al., Physician Staffing Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients, JAMA, 2002 Nov 6, Vol 288, No 17. 
  8. Gooch, RA, Kahn, JM. ICU Bed Supply, Utilization, and Health Care Spending: An Example of Demand Elasticity. JAMA. 2014;311(6):567-568. 
  9. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, et al. Use of Intensive Care at the End of Life in the United States: An Epidemiologic Study. Critical Care Medicine. 2004;32(3):638–643. 
  10. Medscape Critical Care Lifestyle Report 2016: Bias and Burnout. January 2016. Accessed 2017. 
  11. Better care for more people. Future health index 2024. Commissioned by Philips. 
  12. Lilly CM, et al. ICU Telemedicine Program Financial Outcomes. CHEST. 2017; 151(2):286-297 
Disclaimer
Results are specific to the institution where they were obtained and may not reflect the results achievable at other institutions. Results in other cases may vary.